Technology

Built on mathematics, not on trust.

Priviser is a privacy-preserving distributed computing protocol. Every value is split into random shares, the computation runs on the shares, and the answer is identical to what the pooled data would have given. This page sets it beside the alternatives, explains what that means for security and compliance, and shows what developers actually write.

Why Priviser

Others move the data or ask for trust.

Priviser is a new category of privacy-preserving computation rather than a variant of federated learning, hardware enclaves or homomorphic encryption. When the market says confidential computing it usually means trusted execution environments, which move the trust into a chip and its vendor, whereas Priviser's confidentiality rests on mathematics alone.

Data warehouseFederated learningTrusted execution (TEE)Homomorphic encryptionPriviser
Data stays with its ownerNo, it must be ingestedYes, but gradients leakYes, inside a vendor's chipYesYes, nothing informative crosses the wire
Whom you must trustThe platformThe aggregatorThe hardware vendorThe maths, at a heavy priceThe maths
Result vs plaintextIdenticalApproximateIdenticalApproximate, noise growsIdentical, verified
General computationYes, centralisedTraining onlyPredefined queriesNarrow circuitsAnalytics, training, inference, joins
CostIntegrationBandwidthHardware lock-inOrders of magnitude slowerLow, constant rounds

Priviser

Data stays with its owner
Yes, nothing informative crosses the wire
Whom you must trust
The maths
Result vs plaintext
Identical, verified
General computation
Analytics, training, inference, joins
Cost
Low, constant rounds

Data warehouse

Data stays with its owner
No, it must be ingested
Whom you must trust
The platform
Result vs plaintext
Identical
General computation
Yes, centralised
Cost
Integration

Federated learning

Data stays with its owner
Yes, but gradients leak
Whom you must trust
The aggregator
Result vs plaintext
Approximate
General computation
Training only
Cost
Bandwidth

Trusted execution (TEE)

Data stays with its owner
Yes, inside a vendor's chip
Whom you must trust
The hardware vendor
Result vs plaintext
Identical
General computation
Predefined queries
Cost
Hardware lock-in

Homomorphic encryption

Data stays with its owner
Yes
Whom you must trust
The maths, at a heavy price
Result vs plaintext
Approximate, noise grows
General computation
Narrow circuits
Cost
Orders of magnitude slower
Non-rival

The same dataset serves everyone

A computation by one subscriber takes nothing away from the next, so the same dataset can serve any number of subscribers at once without being depleted or disclosed.

Tailored

Competitors join the same network

Because nobody reads anybody's data, competing firms subscribe to the same datasets and each combines them with its own context, and everybody's edge stays private.

Super-additive

Every dataset raises the value of the rest

A dataset is worth what it adds in combination with every other private context on the network, and that sum grows with each participant who joins.

Built on mathematics, not on trust.

Security and compliance

Only your own process ever reads your data.

What leaves your node is a set of random shares that reveal nothing on their own, and no party, Priviser included, ever holds enough of them to reconstruct anything. Since no personal data is transferred, data-protection and sovereignty rules are not something you have to work around, because the computation never triggers them in the first place.

Data stays with its owner

Whether a dataset is published or not, the raw data never leaves the contributor's environment, and withdrawing it leaves nothing behind anywhere.

Confined to one path

Every task runs in an isolated container that can see only the registered dataset, under limited permissions.

No trusted hardware

There are no enclaves, no vendor in the trust chain and no attestation to break, because the guarantee is mathematical rather than physical.

Verified by every party

Each participant checks every result, and code, models and outputs are protected in the same way as the inputs.

Developers

Write ordinary Python.

You submit a single file or a project with an entrypoint, bind its variables to datasets on any site, and choose a runtime, whether NumPy serial, NumPy parallel or Torch on GPU. Joins, statistics, regression, trees, support vector machines, Gaussian processes, multilayer perceptrons, convolutional networks and transformer components all run as secure operators underneath, so your code reads the way the plaintext version would.

Custom and template tasks

Bring your own code, or start from curated algorithms for correlation, joint histograms and other common analyses.

Multi-site bindings

One task can span many nodes, and both vertical and horizontal data splits are handled natively.

Exact results

Everything runs in native float64 with exact non-linearities, so there is no fixed-point arithmetic and no polynomial approximation to erode your accuracy.

Roadmap

Next come large models on GPU clusters, agent orchestration, hardware-backed entropy, multi-cluster RoCE/RDMA and a native decentralised tensor.

Get in touch

If your data cannot move, talk to us.

A briefing takes about an hour and leaves you with a clear view of what your data could be worth on the network, and of what it would take to compute on the data you cannot reach today.

Request a briefing